NOBODY knows for sure what Jane Austen looked like ... Scholars think that a small pencil-and-watercolor sketch by her older sister, Cassandra, now hanging in the National Portrait Gallery in London, is a fairly trustworthy likeness ... The image is sufficiently homely that Wordsworth Editions, a British publisher, recently decided to Photoshop it, removing the frumpy headgear and giving Jane some hair extensions and a bit of blush in her cheeks.
Also from the article:
Austen “wasn’t much of a looker,” Helen Trayler, the managing director of Wordsworth, told reporters in Britain. “She’s the most inspiring, readable author, but to put her on the cover wouldn’t be very inspiring at all.”
Ms. Trayler added that she was also thinking of making over “George Eliot, who was frumpy, and William Wordsworth, who was pretty hideous.”
Pictures at the link.
Also from the article:
Austen “wasn’t much of a looker,” Helen Trayler, the managing director of Wordsworth, told reporters in Britain. “She’s the most inspiring, readable author, but to put her on the cover wouldn’t be very inspiring at all.”
Ms. Trayler added that she was also thinking of making over “George Eliot, who was frumpy, and William Wordsworth, who was pretty hideous.”
Pictures at the link.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 07:58 pm (UTC)Re: totally OT
Date: 2007-04-02 09:26 pm (UTC)also k_calypso has it and my skype.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 09:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-02 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-03 01:48 am (UTC)And no, I know better than that.