hel_ana: (Default)
The Region of Waterloo has announced two new clinics on Saturday.

They will undoubtedly be even more of a zoo than the weekday ones, but for those capable of getting up early enough to line up, it might be your best bet.
hel_ana: (Default)
..as outlined in my hardass vaccination post:

The reason I expect you to inform me of your vaccination status if you want to hang out with the baby is *not* so that I can ban you summarily. It's so that we can then discuss, rationally, what infection vectors you've been exposed to.

Someone who's primarily been alone in their apartment for three days before coming over (and who hasn't been exposed anyone who's sick in over a week) isn't likely to pose a risk; the disease is contagious for a day before symptoms show up and for 7-10 days afterwards.

Someone, OTOH, who works in an office with 3 people out with the flu would be someone who I'd consider to have a high chance of being an infection vector.

So, yeah. It's a prelimary screening tool, not a final or summary judgement.
hel_ana: (Default)
Since talking about H1N1 has become the fashionable thing to do, I can't resist any more.

First, I'll state my biases up front and plain: I am as pro-vaccination (in a general sense) as it's possible to be. Vaccination, in my not so humble opinion, in a listing of the most important medical breakthroughs ranks up there with Nightingale's push for higher nursing standards and sanitary conditions in hospitals and the discovery of antibiotics. Vaccines have saved countless lives, and helped make the modern world by cutting down on childhood mortality, which helped lead (in the developed world) to a sea change in childbearing patterns. Beyond this,as a number of my friends know, my grandmother trained as a nurse at Sick Kids Hospital in the 30s and therefore nursed patients with diseases like mumps, measles, rubella, and polio. They were not benign diseases. So that's my bias up front. If you're virulently anti-vaccination, this is not the post for you. I'll be getting the shot, as soon as I reasonably can, whether it's through my doctor or at a clinic, and I have no intentions of waiting for the pregnant-lady version.

With that said, here's what I think about H1N1 behind a cut, because I love you )

Pursuant to the last point 5 under the cut (and I've left this out of the cut because it's non-negotiable):
I expect to be informed of your immunization status if you want to see my daughter. I further expect, if you have chosen not to be vaccinated, that you will not take offense if I don't allow you into close contact with her.

Edited to add: I do *not* expect anyone to justify why they've chosen to not get stuck - like I said, I respect that it's your body, your decision - just that they haven't *if* they want to hang out with the child.

(And yes, I know that there are bunches and bunches of you who only want advanced warning that a newborn will be in the vicinity so that you can get the hell away.. obviously, this isn't directed at you, so you don't need to tell me that you don't want to hang out with my kid, thanks.)

So there. That's what I think.
hel_ana: (Default)
And not for the reasons you're imagining. Sure, there is no questioning my devotion to IKEA and ABBA.. but neither of them can compare to the Swedish awesomeness to be found in this story.

"A class at Gustavslund school in south central Sweden spent more than two years studying gender roles before setting sights on the 2008 Toys "R" Us Christmas catalog.

...

The class filed a complaint with Swedish regulatory agency Reklamombudsmannen, which is a member of the European Advertising Standards Alliance, arguing that the catalog modeled restrictive sex stereotypes."
(longer article at the link)
hel_ana: (Default)
I wonder how long we'll have to wait for the Polanski-apologists to publish a petition asking Canada to drop the charges against this guy, since, you know.. it's been so long and all, so "they should just drop it"
hel_ana: (Default)
I'm really not sure what to think of Ontario's planned approach to the flu/H1N1.

Specifically, I'm really not that enamoured with the idea of waiting until December or January for the seasonal flu shot; there's a reason they normally roll it out in October. And since they're not starting the H1N1 program until November, by the time they get around to the H1N1, in all likelyhood, I won't be pregnant anymore. If it starts circulating in larger concentrations in October (not unlikely, from what I've read), I'm at increased risk of complications, with nothing to mitigate save staying hidden in my house.
hel_ana: (Default)
It's days like these that I'm left see-sawing between "do I really need eardrums?" and "Three more weeks. Three more weeks"

After a week's absence, Annoying Cow-irker is back. And he's been in the office next door to me, nattering on, for half an hour. I can't really follow the conversation, because the person whose office he's invaded is speaking in a normal conversational level. He, on the other hand, I'm pretty sure can be heard by everyone in the office. If you've been to our office, you know that it's a big one, for all that there are only 17 of us here.

It's going to be a long day. And he hasn't even come to natter at me yet.

::sigh::

Seriously?

Sep. 20th, 2009 11:01 pm
hel_ana: (Default)
This article makes me want to take a shower. Not because of the behaviour of the subjects of the article, but because the sleaziness of the reporter/editor/publisher.

So a former Conservative MP gets busted for DUI and possession of cocaine. So why in the hell is the article about his wife? Her looks. Her history in pageants. Her hometown, family, appearance on Rick Mercer. Her lapses in judgment. (And I'm not claiming she's perfect or wonderful or anything, but she sure as hell doesn't deserve a hatchet-job of an article triggered by her husband's arrest.)

Apparently the husband has gone to ground. So they're going after the wife. Seriously, Star.. this isn't reporting. It's tabloid muckraking at its worst, and unless you have evidence that she poured the drinks down his throat, planted coke in his car, put the keys in his hand and shoved him into the car, perhaps you should lay the fuck off her and do some actual journalism.
hel_ana: (Default)
Yesterday, I got out to the first SCA event I've been to since (as far as I can recall) May 2008. Which, not coincidentally, was when I started dating the Paramour. I had an absolutely delightful time, though didn't get to spend time with everyone I wanted to, or as much time as I'd have liked. I did get to spend time with Eve and the rest of the family, which was wonderful. Georgia is beautiful, and Lex is a sweetie, though his mama is definitely top of the "didn't get to spend time with" list (I'm really hoping that can be changed once I'm on mat leave myself).

The people really are the reason I did the SCA as long as I did; I suspect the reason I let it go without a struggle is that many of the people who I really enjoy are on LJ (or FB), so I can keep up with them and have a method of contact to arrange one on one meetings as my schedule allows. I don't really feel the magic anymore; the emotion I felt in court yesterday came from knowing the people involved and their relationships to each other, not from the spectacle. I left when I still wanted to stay, which I suspect helps with feeling good about an event; events in the past where I've stayed past the point I've been having fun always seem to be tainted by the end.

I had to leave early, however, so that I could get some work done and so that the Paramour could make it up to the weather station in time for the Doors Open tour. He was able to hit the last guided tour of the day, and then we went over to my parents' place for a tasty lamb dinner. My nephew has finally accepted that my sister's going to have another baby (up until recently, when he was asked "is there a baby in Aunt Adrienne's tummy?" he gave an emphatic yes, but when immediately thereafter asked if there was a baby in Mummy's tummy, gave an equally emphatic no. It was all kinds of adorable). And man, is he ever a fan of the Paramour's. Once "Uncle [paramourName]" arrives, everyone else (except his father) is pretty much chopped liver.

Today involved work and surgical strikes on Sears (for my stroller) Zellers (because they're having their seasonal Baby Days) and Zehrs (for dinner, a very tasty PC deep dish sirloin and vegetable pie).

And now we talk about pregnancy stuff, behind a cut so that those who aren't interested don't have to read )
hel_ana: (Default)
All my best to [livejournal.com profile] lovecraftienne and TG today. I'm sorry to miss the celebrations, but have a pile of work from Florida to start today.

I hope it's a wonderful day for you.
hel_ana: (Default)
The RNC has sent out a doozy of a survey, which includes all manner of excellent examples of survey questions designed to get specific answers. Quelle suprise.

Those of you who have a background in marketing and survey design may find picking it apart entertaining. For instance, consider the following question, with my commentary in italics:

"It has been suggested (by this survey/the RNC, since no-one else is batshit crazy enough to make this shit up) that the government could use voter registration to determine a person's political affiliation, prompting fears ("prompted" wholly by this survey making it up) that GOP voters might be discriminated against for medical treatment in a Democrat-imposed (ignoring, for the moment, that they were democratically elected to both houses and the presidency with some really healthy margins) health care rationing system (note the clever use of "heath care rationing system" as a description). Does this possibility (which is to say, mere speculation to stir up FUD) concern you?"

(Ironically, Washington state, the home state of the gentleman whose copy is scanned for this article, does not register voters according to political party.)

There's lots more fun stuff, since the entire survey is scanned and reproduced at the link above.
hel_ana: (Default)
and 8 more weekends left before I go on mat leave. Which means 8 more weeks of work, two of which are long weekends, since my last week of work is the week of the Thanksgiving holiday.

So what did I do with my weekend? Friday night, the Paramour and I wandered the mall and I picked up an outfit for LC (lj-handle for the baby), and the Paramour picked up a pillow.

Saturday, I did some sewing prep work, ran some errands, and hosted [livejournal.com profile] emortimer and [livejournal.com profile] the_real_crispy for dinner and a movie night in the spiffy attic TV room. Great fun and food was had, and [livejournal.com profile] emortimer found out the extent of my preparation and was horrified.

And yesterday, [livejournal.com profile] emortimer and [livejournal.com profile] the_real_crispy and I went to pick up the crib I bought on Kijiji (after [livejournal.com profile] emortimer went out shopping for LC), and then I did sewing stuff and rounded out the evening with the Paramour, watching an episode of Penn & Teller's BS! followed by an episode of Connections.

The cool part, of course, is that my life and LJ is only going to get more excited once LC arrives. /sarcasm

Like that.
hel_ana: (Default)
I'm learning, slowly and ungracefully, my new spoon-limit; turns out that when your body is spending spoons on growing a baby, you get fewer to use for stuff you want to do. Who knew? In short, I massively overdid it yesterday and ended up having to take an hour long nap in the midst of the party. We'll leave unmentioned, for the time being, my suspicion that I've developed pregnancy-induced sciatica. Do.Not.Want.

Turning to better things, the party was absolutely lovely. The house behaves exactly the way I'd want for a party, with nice outdoor space and a decent amount of space inside for hanging out. And the kitchen is big enough for bunches of people to help out with prep; thanks to Sara and Keren (note to everyone: if you want guacamole at your party, the Carr sisters are your best bet; it was awesome). The party wrapped up around midnight, and the Paramour and I stayed up talking for a while longer.

Today was not wholly slothful (dishes and a load of laundry were all accomplished, along with some errand running) but did involve a lot of web surfing while watching my landlord diagnose and treat the electrical issue that had us unable to use the downstairs bathroom partway through the party. Not only did he fix that, he also discovered the source of the problem with the kitchen light/fan fixture, which hasn't worked since we moved in, and which I assumed just didn't work.

Turns out that the spray foam insulation guys had filled the switch box with foam and so the contacts couldn't, you know, make contact. ::headdesk::

After we got home from errand running, I had a good long nap until the Paramour woke me up to have dinner, which was awesome. He had a steak, and I had a lamb and rosemary sausage, with corn on the cob. We also cleaned up a couple of leftovers. Then we retreated to the air conditioned TV room to watch a movie.

And now to bed.

Tomorrow, I'll pick up [livejournal.com profile] real_jayde far too early for my complete happiness. We're going to have wacky London adventures, and it will be awesome. And I should be back in town by 5pm, and anticipate hitting the pool at 7pm.
hel_ana: (Default)
Oh.For.Fucks.Sake

Seriously?

I swear to god, you know that old saying "there are three types of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics"? Apparently we need to add a new category "palin lies", because this goes beyond "damned lies" into a new level of deceit.

Shut up, you stupid bitch. Seriously.
hel_ana: (Default)
An article in today's Star takes on the "dueling couches" ads of Rogers and Bell (full disclosure, I've only heard the radio versions of the campaign's ads, which, for obvious reasons, don't have couches).

Part of the article is discussing with various advertising people whether the strategy is a good idea or not. Thus, we get this gem:

"That style of creative advertising takes the intellectual high ground, says Anthony Wolch, executive creative director at TBWA Toronto. "Why can't Rogers and Bell go there?" he asks. Bell should focus on its progressive technologies, he says. "What makes them special and loved by Canadians."

That's right. They should focus on what makes them "special" and "loved by Canadians".

For the Canadians in the audience, I don't have to go any further than this. You've all gotten the joke.

For non-Canadians in my audience, I can only say that Exxon *might* have a more difficult time finding reasons that they're loved by Alaskans and British Columbians than these two companies will have finding reasons Canadians love them.

I must commend Mr. Wolch on his ability to make this suggestion with a straight face.
hel_ana: (Default)
or at least on either end of my weekend.

Friday night saw the Paramour and I making the trek out to Fergus to stay at my parents' overnight; Mom and Dad are in England and a) like someone to occasionally stay at the house when they're gone, b) have mail what needs to be picked up, and c) had some newly planted flowers that needed to be watered. Since I'm closer than my sister is, and I don't have a 3 year old to be disturbed by routine change, I was it.

We had pizza, watched TV -- including introducing the Paramour to Treehouse in the form of Dragon and the Backyardigans (which was entertainment in itself) -- and we hit the local Zellers where I scored 30 baby wash cloths for 10 bucks. Saturday morning, while he slept in, I did all the errands around the house that we were there for, and then we headed back to KW in the early afternoon.

On Saturday night we attended an absolutely fantastic party to warm the deck of our friends, who are coincidentally neighbours of [livejournal.com profile] zanate and the lovely [livejournal.com profile] quingawaga. The deck was very nice, I met an old university roommate of the Paramours, and was suitably awed by the host's bar setup and his TV-like presentation skills while mixing cocktails.

When I got home that night, I discovered that a landscaping build day had been called for this afternoon. Since I promised Grover that I'd come out to help once they started the landscaping (that is, once they were no longer working with solvents), I talked to the Paramour about the best way to arrange that into my day... we'd had a date arranged for dim sum today and I didn't want to cancel that, however the build day started an hour before dim sum opened. We arranged to go at 11, so I missed the first 2+ hours of the landscaping, but I had tasty tasty dim sum. And, as it turns out, the restaurant is closing tomorrow for their annual holiday, so I wouldn't have been able to go next week.

The afternoon was filled with helping other people pull up grass, scrape up old mulch, and lay down blackout. It was also filled with more sun than my sunscreen was adequate to the task of, and ended when I started to feel like throwing up. So I called for a ride, came home, and showered and slept for 3 hours. I'm still stiff and sunburn-y, but more human feeling. Thanks to everyone at the build day for being understanding of my slower pace and wall-hitting.

Now I'm making rice and reheating the cheesy tuna mixture for on top of it and I suspect I'll round out the evening with some Dr. Who. Or maybe some Gilmore Girls. Or possibly both.

Tomorrow is my monthly family-doctor-prenatal appointment and tomorrow evening I'll be back in Fergus. After last week, I suspect this one is going to drag a bit.
hel_ana: (Default)
There are currently two radio ad campaigns that annoy me to the point of changing the station.

The first is the current series of Michigan Tourism ads in which a smarmy (though I suspect it's supposed to be "soothing") male voice decries the rat race that makes your life suck or how much better things were in the old days, and then presents a solution in the form of a trip to Michigan, where the air is purer, you can breathe deeper, the lumberjacks are taller, and other shit like that.

Seriously, guys.. if your life sucks as badly as the ads are implying, a weekend in the upper peninsula isn't going to fix it. I realize most of modern advertising relies on convincing you that your life has a giant gaping hole that can only be filled by product X, but, man, Michigan Tourism apparently forgot to read the footnote reading "at least *try* to be subtle".

The second is the Shaw* Festival's "what's wrong with you, you shitty, selfish, horrible person that you won't drive the very short distance to our theatre, here, let me pretend to put in your postal code to reiterate how stupid and shitty you are for not buying tickets" campaign. Seriously? You honestly think scolding me is going to get me into your theatre?

Now, my parents are members at the Shaw, and go down a few times a year. Until I heard this ad campaign, I had a generally good opinion of the festival, based on my parents' enjoyment and general reputation. But now? You couldn't *give* me tickets to a show at the the festival.

Ugh. I know that there are some supremely talented advertising/marketing people out there, who make informative, interesting, and/or funny campaigns. But then there are these chuckleheads who make me want to pull out and nuke the bastards from orbit.

*note that this is my assumption, given that it's theatre in Niagara; I generally turn the station as soon as I hear the voice, so details are sketchy.
hel_ana: (Default)
My company closed today for the holiday, which has split my week up nicely between the "oh good god I think I'm going to have to kill both you, creator of this document, and whoever at MS was responsible for the pain of trying to write large document sets in Word" part and the "getting do New and Interesting documentation stuff" part. Happily, those are listed in chronological order, so tomorrow will involve no user guides from hell.

The only drawback to doing Canada Day on Canada Day, then, is that there is no long weekend in my immediate future.

So today, I slept in, did laundry, and mowed the lawn. That's right, we Canadians know how to do a holiday right...

I also discovered that my neighbour had indeed taken down the laundry line, I suspect to more easily have access to the back yard when he periodically mows it for me if I've been remiss/busy. I hadn't used it up to the point where he took it down, since a) May was stupid rainy and b) I kept forgetting to get clothes pins until the Paramour picked me up some. Thus, he thought that no-one was using it.

It's back up now, and he was kind enough to help me with the back yard by doing the edging with his much-more-butch-than-mine weed whacker. To thank him, I gave him a jar of the strawberry jam I made on Saturday at [livejournal.com profile] the_nita's place.

After that, the Paramour and I went up to Waterloo, to hit the Shoppers and Home Depot gardening centre (former to buy, latter to browse), and then stopped for fries at Sonny's, where we saw a big, loud something at the top of a power pole go pop, make a weird yellowy-green flash of light, and smoke a bit. On the way out, we noticed that, unfortunately, it'd killed one of the birds that were hanging out on the power lines.

So tomorrow it's back to work. I was originally supposed to have an appointment on Friday to see my family doctor, but it got switched to Monday. Thus, I have two days to work on the new Flash demo and proposal for the bright and shiny new way of doing documentation that I want to switch to. (Yeah, we will please leave aside any comments on the lack of sanity involved in proposing a wholesale change in the product documentation three and a half months before my maternity leave starts, 'k?)

As an aside, I realize that, to the casual reader, I probably haven't been posting much. I have been, but mostly on the filter I have set up for the pregnancy/baby, which I've figured is of limited interest to most. If I'm wrong about that, and you've been pining to hear about prenatal visits, ultrasounds, and swollen feet, let me know and I'll add you.
Page generated Jun. 12th, 2025 05:48 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios