"The fact that this is better than what the majority of people in NA are doing now is what's important, not that it's still inferior to what you were able to do."
Granted. But it still seems rather silly to me that such a thing as this should be considered "progress." At the time my kids were in diapers, I think such an idea as this would probably have been universally laughed at.
I also wonder how "environmentally friendly" this process really is. It may be "better than landfill", as you said, but what process do they use and what other effects does it have on the environment? Somehow I doubt that water and detergent would do what is necessary. So what chemicals do they use and what happens to them after use?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 11:59 am (UTC)Granted. But it still seems rather silly to me that such a thing as this should be considered "progress." At the time my kids were in diapers, I think such an idea as this would probably have been universally laughed at.
I also wonder how "environmentally friendly" this process really is. It may be "better than landfill", as you said, but what process do they use and what other effects does it have on the environment? Somehow I doubt that water and detergent would do what is necessary. So what chemicals do they use and what happens to them after use?